Which of the two is the most natural way of saying it? Ask walter, he knows who's who. It is probably acceptable in the salutation (if you really don't know the name of the person) but not otherwise.
The genius trick to get your kids to want to do chores Artofit
It is always far better to find out the. Using sir/madam is nearly always wrong. Here, what is the meaning of "who's who"?
Was it whose fault or who's fault?
I think #2 but may i be mistaken? While searching the internet i came across this and thought i would share it with you in order to understand whether there is something wrong there and why. I don't know who's fault was that! From these words alone (so, without appealing to different versions, translations, likelihoods of names, etc.), is there some way to.
I was doing an english exercise and i read the following sentence: Which of the following sentences is correct? Who is this or who is that makes sense when you can refer to the person (perhaps. When you try to explain something to a person, and they still believe in what they want to, even if you've given them evidence to prove your point, what is that person called?
These kind of branding strategies are adopted by those firms and organisations whose sales are decreasing day by day.
Both pairs of phrases are perfectly acceptable. Where could this come from and is it any way correct? I read nearly all the contents of the websites about the war between the nazi and russian armies. Then maybe they confuse it with whoever's ?
Which to choose depends on context.
